Aged care regulator spends $29k on factual advice for COVID-19 Freedom of Knowledge request
The agency accountable for regulating the worn care sector spent almost $30,000 hiring a main-tier legislation firm to answer to a Freedom of Knowledge (FOI) request from ABC News.
- The worn care regulator spent $28,900 seeking factual advice on FOI requests
- It defended the trace, arguing it used to be in terms of “a pair of” enquiries
- The regulator has approach below scrutiny throughout the Aged Care Royal Commission
In step with a document published on the Commonwealth’s AusTender internet page, the Aged Care Quality and Security Commission (ACQSC) reduced in measurement Clayton Utz to hiss on what it described as an “FOI request from ABC re. COVID-19”.
The trace of the contract dated October 7 used to be $28,900 — almost double the trace of a mid-stage home care equipment.
The nature of the documents the ABC used to be seeking used to be now not published in the cushy document but in an announcement the ACQSC mentioned there had been “a pair of” FOI requests which extended “smartly past a single day’s work”.
“The commission routinely seeks factual advice in responding to FOI requests to be definite we note all linked legislation,” the statement mentioned.
Highlight on assessors
The FOI requests appear to were lodged after ACQSC Commissioner Janet Anderson seemed sooner than the Aged Care Royal Commission and published the need of quality tests being implemented on nursing properties had fallen throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
That is in spite of the regulator being given an additional $6.5 million to rent extra assessors.
A subsequent investigation by the ABC came all the scheme in which via the regulator had visited elegant 13 per cent — or 30 of the 220 — worn care properties which had suffered coronavirus outbreaks.
The ACQSC is funded by the federal govt and assesses nursing properties in opposition to 44 nationwide requirements once every three years.
In its interim document entitled “Neglect”, the royal commission labelled the insist of the worn care machine “unhappy and beautiful” and mentioned the regulatory regime used to be “unfit for cause” and it “does now not adequately deter terrible practices”.
“Certainly, it frequently fails to detect them,” the interim document mentioned.