There used to be confusion on Friday after the Supreme Court’s record transferring the cases towards Trinamool Congress national total secretary Abhishek Banerjee from Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta High Court.

The cases show to the alleged multi-crore scam in the recruitment of educating and non-educating workers in thunder-bustle faculties in West Bengal.

The initial confusion that persevered for a while since the info used to be flashed used to be over whether or now now not the Supreme Court’s record pertained to the total cases linked to the alleged recruitment scams or to correct those linked with Abhishek Banerjee.

It used to be Calcutta High Court advocate and CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya who identified that there is a defective belief that the total cases linked to the recruitment scam beget been transferred from the bench of Justice Gangopadhyay.

Finally, the confusion ended on Friday evening after the Supreme Court record used to be uploaded and it used to make sure that only two cases beget been transferred from the bench of Justice Gangopadhyay.

There used to be speculation about how long Justice Gangopadhyay will continue with the hearing of the closing cases.

This arose from an announcement by Justice Gangopadhyay who had himself expressed apprehension on this depend. “Actual now, two cases beget been transferred from my bench. I doubt that the closing cases may possibly possibly well additionally be transferred from my bench on same grounds,” he stated slack on Friday evening.

A Calcutta High Court officer stated on condition of anonymity that duration reassignments of the issues of cases for the judges are carried out as section of the note by the Chief Justice or performing Chief Justice.

“This sort of reassignment of issues is due and, in that job, it’s miles that you just are going to have the selection to think of that Justice Gangopadhyay is assigned any arena other than education,” he stated.

On this possibility, quite loads of of us, especially those deprived candidates agitating in Kolkata, beget raised the build a matter to on whether or now now not the vogue of “expeditious actions and orders” procedure by Justice Gangopadhyay will likely be maintained by the think who would be given the assignment of hearing the recruitment scam cases.

Per frail advocate total of West Bengal Jayanta Mitra, even though the transfer of cases used to be wretched there is now now not any aim to be upset over the pattern.

“If the cases are argued firmly on the premise of stable apt aspects, there is now now not any aim to apprehend that justice will likely be delayed in any bench headed by any think,” he stated.

Calcutta High Court counsel Kaushik Gupta feels that it’s a bad vogue for democracy when the “faith for justice” is entrusted to “one think” in region of the “complete judicial machine.”

“Basically, Justice Gangopadhyay himself seen that it’s miles now now not that you just are going to have the selection to think of that he’ll continue for ever and that would now not indicate that his exit will stall the total judicial job. So, of us who’re nurturing or propagating the premise that transfer of a explicit case or some cases from one bench to yet every other will indicate the stop of justice, they enact now now not beget even a total thought of the apt and judicial machine and the concept that of justice,” Gupta stated.

Retired Supreme Court think, Justice Asok Kunar Ganguly has raised the build a matter to how a long way the apex court docket used to be within its rights to enlighten the transfer of those two cases from the bench of Justice Gangopadhyay.

“Doubtlessly the apex court docket has its beget reasons to give such an record. With due admire to the Supreme Court, I am pronouncing that the transfer of any case from one bench to the opposite in any high court docket is the prerogative of the executive justice of that high court docket. Beneath the provisions of the Indian Constitution, any record by any high court docket can even be turned down by the Supreme Court. But there is now now not any provision for the apex court docket to resolve which bench of a high court docket will hear which topic or case,” he stated.

Nonetheless, he permitted the Supreme Court’s observation that judges set now now not beget any industry to give interviews to data channels on issues pending earlier than them.

Meanwhile, infighting has began in the Congress especially over the reality that in the transferred cases the counsel representing Abhishek Banerjee used to be Congress leader and senior counsel of the apex court docket, Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

Teach Congress leader, Kaustav Bagchi, who’s himself a counsel of the Calcutta High Court, wondered Singhvi on his lawful justification to speak the Trinamool Congress leader on this case.

“Singhvi may possibly possibly well build ahead the same ancient argument of skilled compulsion of a training counsel. But he must now now not neglect that besides being a training counsel he is additionally a senior Congress leader. The in style Congress employees in West Bengal beget mountainous downside in accepting such of us as leaders. The event leader is at liberty to take any action towards me for making the kind of statement,” he stated.