Koeberg mills are honest one more Eskom scam – Chris Yelland
Eskom has been in the highlight, once again, as the Zondo Fee persevered its issue set inquiry into its board and the dismissal of three senior participants. Several whistle blowers safe stepped forward to shine a mild-weight on circumstances of corruption. If truth be told, used Eskom head of suitable and compliance Suzanne Daniels mentioned refined manipulation to award contracts to other folks friendly to ANC participants was the norm, and orders from the ministry of public enterprises on how Eskom business can also peaceable be performed took space on a day-to-day basis. Energy educated Chris Yelland delves into the shadowy waters surrounding the Koeberg nuclear vitality role, and the contract awarded to French contractor, Areva, below fishy phrases. – Claire Badenhorst
Steam mills for Koeberg: the most costly transport of scrap steel in the history of humankind
By Chris Yelland*
The beginning of the foremost of six original steam mills by Areva final week to lengthen the lifetime of Eskom’s Koeberg nuclear vitality role finds another scam at Eskom, perpetrated at some level of the nefarious management of Brian Molefe, Matshela Koko and the dodgy Eskom board at the time.
On the premise of a three-month shorter beginning time, the R5bn steam generator replacement contract was at final awarded to French issue-owned nuclear contractor, Areva, who after running into monetary difficulties, are now managed by French nationwide electrical energy utility, Electricite dé France (EDF).
This followed an extended High Court docket, Attraction Court docket and Constitutional Court docket battle in South Africa, in which Westinghouse (in the break unsuccessfully) tried to articulate the irregular contract award to Areva on the premise that the claimed urgency of the life-extension was deliberately contrived by Eskom in snort to wrongfully award the contract to Areva.
At the time when Koeberg was built between 1976 and 1985, Framatome (the predecessor to Areva) manufactured the two 900 MW nuclear reactors and the six associated steam mills at Koeberg, the usage of designs licenced from Westinghouse.
Both Eskom and Areva claimed that it was fully essential for gather operation of the vitality plant and for safety of electrical energy provide in South Africa that the steam mills can also peaceable be at final replaced at some level of the so-called “X23” outage at Koeberg in 2018.
Read also: Chris Yelland: Extra finger-pointing at Eskom – COO cleared of costs
This was cited by Eskom as the purpose in the aid of awarding the contract to Areva, where an allegedly contrived three-month “waft” in Areva’s challenge thought was indicated as the deciding ingredient. This with out reference to Westinghouse having met the general technical and industrial necessities, with a decrease contract impress, and a guarantee to meet the 2018 completion date on trouble of enormous penalties.
On the different hand, all has now not long past wisely for Areva in executing the challenge.
Areva is supposed to safe skilled serious manufacturing quality complications with the steam generator forgings in France. In stare of the claimed time criticality of the challenge, to safe to the bottom of these points Eskom and Areva agreed that the uncompleted forgings would be air-freighted to China where an Areva “accomplice” would total the produce.
It appears, every of the six steam generator forgings required the hiring of a Russian Antonov freighter airplane (six flights in total) to hover the forgings from France to China. On the different hand, fixed with an impeccable source, after taking a smarter see at the forgings, Areva’s Chinese accomplice decided to scrap them and birth up again from scratch.
One can handiest speculate as to why it was now not realizing of less costly for Areva to hover engineers from the Chinese producer to France to peep the steam generator forgings, as against flying all six steam mills to China for the inspection, forward of them being scrapped in China.
A used senior nuclear government at Eskom commented to this author at the time that: “This was the most costly transport of scrap steel in the history of humankind”.
Eskom has since confirmed to EE Industrial Intelligence final week that: “The forgings didn’t meet the anticipated quality standards and would possibly perhaps well peaceable now not be popular, and therefore they had been scrapped by the contractor at their very bear fee”.
Primarily primarily primarily based on Eskom, the contractual beginning date of all six steam mills was February 2018, with the contractual completion date for the replacement of all six steam mills being the cessation of 2019.
On the different hand, with the general delays in the challenge, including restarting produce of the steam mills from scratch in China, beginning of the foremost three steam mills for Unit 1 at Koeberg is handiest beginning now in September 2020, with those for Unit 2 handiest scheduled for beginning in the third quarter of 2021.
Read also: Chris Yelland: Musical chairs at issue nuclear corporation – can also peaceable axed Necsa CEO be re-hired?
Concerning the actual replacement of the steam mills, Eskom now says that: “Set up is aligned with the outages scheduled for 2021 and 2022 respectively for the two Koeberg reactor items (Unit 1 and Unit 2)”. No level out is now made by Eskom of the criticality for completion in 2018 cited by Eskom at the time as the purpose in the aid of putting a more costly contract with Areva.
Whereas now not answering explicit questions on the fee overruns coming up for the challenge, Eskom insists that: “The estimated fee-to-completion for the challenge is within the genuine rate range popular in 2014”. In truth, here is now not very precious, because the genuine rate range popular in 2014 is now not disclosed, and can safe been vastly elevated that the contract impress.
On the different hand, it appears clear that Eskom has indubitably paid a top rate for the replacement by Areva of the steam mills at Koeberg on the premise of a claimed three-month shorter completion time, when indubitably completion will most definitely be some three years longer.
It’s an used trick, but it absolutely clearly peaceable works.
- Chris Yelland, managing director, EE Industrial Intelligence.
(Visited 1,534 times, 1,534 visits at present time)