Montana federal prosecutor warns of dangers of pot legalization earlier than vote
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Montana’s high federal prosecutor is urging voters to tread fastidiously sooner than vote casting to legalize recreational marijuana, taking the irregular step of leaping correct into a political debate a few ballotinitiative within the weeks sooner than the election.
In an op-ed published in several newspapers in most up-to-date days and posted on the Justice Division’s websites on Monday, U.S. Prison expert Kurt Alme told voters they wish to “analysis intimately” a pair of ballotinitiatives that will per chance presumably legalize hashish for adults ages 21 and older, warning that marijuana is addictive, may per chance perchance presumably consequence in extra visitors accidents and may per chance perchance presumably even “enhance the threat of excessive complications from COVID-19.”
Smoking, whether or now not marijuana or tobacco, may per chance perchance presumably enhance threat of excessive COVID-19 as a consequence of possible for lung irritation.
Montana is one amongst 5 states this November vote casting on eight initiatives to legalize marijuana for scientific or recreational use. Dozen of different states comprise already legalized the drug, although marijuana remains illegal under federal regulation.
Though historic Prison expert Contemporary Jeff Durations in 2018 rescinded an Obama administration protection that had eased enforcement of federal marijuana licensed pointers in states that legalized the drug, hashish experts hiss federal prosecutors comprise largely since left marijuana corporations by myself as long as they complied with yelp licensed pointers.
The Justice Division has an increasing selection of attain under scrutiny for some of its messaging earlier than the 2020 election, with Prison expert Contemporary William Barr repeating claims by President Donald Trump, with out evidence, that there will most certainly be trendy fraud with mail-in ballots.
Some historic prosecutors acknowledged they felt Alme’s resolution to weigh in on a yelp ballotask sooner than the election may per chance perchance even just comprise crossed the line.
“It’s highly irregular and wicked for a U.S. Prison expert to weigh in on political questions,” acknowledged Barbara McQuade, a historic U.S. Prison expert for the Eastern District of Michigan.
William Nettles, the historic U.S. Prison expert for the District of South Carolina, agreed, calling it “an abuse of authority” and “irregular behavior.”
A spokeswoman for Alme’s quandary of enterprise, Clair Johnson Howard, acknowledged in an announcement to Reuters that the op-ed “change into once supposed to coach voters on a relate that a great deal impacts the enforcement of federal prison regulation and is a subject about which U.S. Prison expert’s Locations of work comprise grand data.”
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Modifying by Bill Berkrot and Sonya Hepinstall)