Montana federal prosecutor warns of risks of pot legalization before vote
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Montana’s prime federal prosecutor is urging voters to tread reasonably before vote casting to legalize leisure marijuana, taking the distinctive step of jumping right into a political debate about a ballotinitiative in the weeks before the election.
In an op-ed printed in different newspapers in fresh days and posted on the Justice Division’s website on Monday, U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme urged voters they need to “overview in part” a pair of ballotinitiatives that could well legalize cannabis for adults ages 21 and older, warning that marijuana is addictive, could well result in additional traffic accidents and could well even “amplify the threat of severe issues from COVID-19.”
Smoking, whether marijuana or tobacco, could well amplify threat of severe COVID-19 attributable to attainable for lung inflammation.
Montana is one among five states this November vote casting on eight initiatives to legalize marijuana for medical or leisure spend. Dozen of other states hang already legalized the drug, though marijuana remains illegal below federal laws.
Even supposing ragged Attorney Total Jeff Sessions in 2018 rescinded an Obama administration policy that had eased enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that legalized the drug, cannabis experts divulge federal prosecutors hang largely since left marijuana agencies by myself as long as they complied with train laws.
The Justice Division has extra and additional approach below scrutiny for some of its messaging before the 2020 election, with Attorney Total William Barr repeating claims by President Donald Trump, without evidence, that there would possibly possibly be at threat of be neatly-liked fraud with mail-in ballots.
Some ragged prosecutors said they felt Alme’s decision to weigh in on a train ballotdemand of before the election could well furthermore hang crossed the motorway.
“It is a ways extremely distinctive and unhealthy for a U.S. Attorney to weigh in on political questions,” said Barbara McQuade, a ragged U.S. Attorney for the Japanese District of Michigan.
William Nettles, the ragged U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina, agreed, calling it “an abuse of authority” and “strange habits.”
A spokeswoman for Alme’s diagram of labor, Clair Johnson Howard, said in an announcement to Reuters that the op-ed “used to be intended to coach voters on an topic that severely impacts the enforcement of federal felony laws and is a topic topic about which U.S. Attorney’s Locations of work hang worthy knowledge.”
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Bill Berkrot and Sonya Hepinstall)