Weak care regulator spends $29k on correct advice for COVID-19 Freedom of Recordsdata demand
The company liable for regulating the dilapidated care sector spent nearly $30,000 hiring a first-rate-tier legislation firm to answer to a Freedom of Recordsdata (FOI) demand from ABC Data.
- The dilapidated care regulator spent $28,900 searching for correct advice on FOI requests
- It defended the associated price, arguing it used to be in relation to “a few” enquiries
- The regulator has attain below scrutiny all around the Weak Care Royal Commission
In accordance with a doc printed on the Commonwealth’s AusTender web assert, the Weak Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) shriveled Clayton Utz to impart on what it described as an “FOI demand from ABC re. COVID-19”.
The put of the contract dated October 7 used to be $28,900 — almost double the associated price of a mid-level dwelling care kit.
The nature of the paperwork the ABC used to be searching for used to be no longer revealed within the soft doc however in a assertion the ACQSC said there possess been “a few” FOI requests which extended “successfully previous a single day’s work”.
“The commission mechanically seeks correct advice in responding to FOI requests to make certain that we notice all connected legislation,” the assertion said.
Spotlight on assessors
The FOI requests appear to possess been lodged after ACQSC Commissioner Janet Anderson regarded before the Weak Care Royal Commission and revealed the alternative of quality tests being implemented on nursing homes had fallen all around the COVID-19 pandemic.
That’s no topic the regulator being given an additional $6.5 million to rent more assessors.
A subsequent investigation by the ABC discovered the regulator had visited true 13 per cent — or 30 of the 220 — dilapidated care homes which had suffered coronavirus outbreaks.
The ACQSC is funded by the federal authorities and assesses nursing homes in opposition to 44 national standards once each three years.
In its intervening time characterize entitled “Neglect”, the royal commission labelled the utter of the dilapidated care draw “unhappy and frightful” and said the regulatory regime used to be “unfit for aim” and it “doesn’t adequately deter unhappy practices”.
“Indeed, it frequently fails to detect them,” the intervening time characterize said.